Wow i can't believe this was aired on television! Especially on Fox News! Wow, great discussion....
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Go Hosea!!!
Ok, i'm gonna dumb down my blog for today only cuz my chef on Top Chef made the final 3!
There's plenty more to blog about that is very serious like the fact that the "stimulus" package, a trillion dollar debt we're passing on to our children and grandchildren was passed with only being made public for AN HOUR and giving the Congress only an hour to read the 1,000 page fucking thing! Outrageous just on it's face. Also there's legislation for the building of FEMA camps in case there is social unrest. And not to mention over 20 states have passed or proposed resolutions to maintain the 10th Amendment which asserts states' rights not expressly delegated to the federal government and Colorado is looking at it.
Ok, i'm dumbing it down, i won't get into it!
Hosea is the executive chef from Boulder's Jax Fish House, which i'm seriously dying to go to. Hosea was awarded Best Chef twice at Denver's International Wine Festival in '06 and '07 and is also the seven time winner of the Flatiron Chef Competition.
I really hope he wins, how sweet would that be if a Colorado Chef won Top Chef?! If you go on the Bravo website there's a poll of who do you think will win, and Hosea is at 8%!! Fuck you all!
Next weeks season finale should be good, i can't wait!
Friday, February 13, 2009
Independent Film Channel's New World Order Film Trailer
The Indepent Film Channel has done a documentary on The New World Order and the trailer recently came out on YouTube. It looks good, can't wait to see it! Looks like they got some footage of Jack McLamb speaking at the Ron Paul Revolution Rally in D.C. me and Justin went to.
The Indepent Film Channel has done a documentary on The New World Order and the trailer recently came out on YouTube. It looks good, can't wait to see it! Looks like they got some footage of Jack McLamb speaking at the Ron Paul Revolution Rally in D.C. me and Justin went to.
Economic Stimulus Bill Mandates $954 Million for Vaccinations, $545 Million for “Genomics Programs”
Mike Adams
Natural News
Friday, Feb 13, 2009
While the Obama administration is attempting to pass the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 in a hurry, NaturalNews readers have begun actually reading the bill, and they’re finding some worrying language that should raise concern among people interested in preserving health freedom and protecting the health of all Americans.
Specifically, one section of the economic stimulus bill designates nearly a billion dollars for new vaccinations of children. This was discovered by Elisha Celeste, a NaturalNews reader. As stated in the bill:
$954,000,000 shall be used as an additional amount to carry out the immunization program authorized by section 317(a), (j), and (k)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (”section 317 immunization program”)
The issue of whether vaccinations are actually helpful or harmful is hotly debated, of course. The pro-vaccine camp believes that the human immune system is a technological failure and that chemical intervention is the only way to protect children. The anti-vaccine camp believes that exposure to non-fatal infections actually strengthens the immune system, creating stronger protections against future infections. Thus, vaccines actually interfere with normal, healthy immune function while injecting children with dangerous chemicals and substances derived from sick, diseased animals.
NaturalNews is against childhood vaccines as explained in this article that completely debunks conventional beliefs about vaccinations: http://www.naturalnews.com/025596.html
Genomics programs?
The economic stimulus bill also requests more than half a billion dollars for “genomics programs”, saying:
$545,000,000 shall be used as an additional amount to carry out chronic disease, health promotion, and genomics programs
What’s interesting about this last quote is that it essentially says this half a billion dollars should be used to carry out three things:
1) Chronic disease programs
2) Health promotion
3) Genomics programs
I don’t have a problem with the second point. “Health promotion” sounds good (unless it’s nothing more than mammograms and mental health screening programs designed to sell more chemotherapy and psych drugs). But what, exactly, is meant by the phrase “…to carry out chronic disease”? And what is meant by “genomics programs”? Are we talking about government-funded genetic experimentation on human babies, perhaps? It wouldn’t be the first time. See: http://www.naturalnews.com/019189.html
Mike Adams
Natural News
Friday, Feb 13, 2009
While the Obama administration is attempting to pass the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 in a hurry, NaturalNews readers have begun actually reading the bill, and they’re finding some worrying language that should raise concern among people interested in preserving health freedom and protecting the health of all Americans.
Specifically, one section of the economic stimulus bill designates nearly a billion dollars for new vaccinations of children. This was discovered by Elisha Celeste, a NaturalNews reader. As stated in the bill:
$954,000,000 shall be used as an additional amount to carry out the immunization program authorized by section 317(a), (j), and (k)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (”section 317 immunization program”)
The issue of whether vaccinations are actually helpful or harmful is hotly debated, of course. The pro-vaccine camp believes that the human immune system is a technological failure and that chemical intervention is the only way to protect children. The anti-vaccine camp believes that exposure to non-fatal infections actually strengthens the immune system, creating stronger protections against future infections. Thus, vaccines actually interfere with normal, healthy immune function while injecting children with dangerous chemicals and substances derived from sick, diseased animals.
NaturalNews is against childhood vaccines as explained in this article that completely debunks conventional beliefs about vaccinations: http://www.naturalnews.com/025596.html
Genomics programs?
The economic stimulus bill also requests more than half a billion dollars for “genomics programs”, saying:
$545,000,000 shall be used as an additional amount to carry out chronic disease, health promotion, and genomics programs
What’s interesting about this last quote is that it essentially says this half a billion dollars should be used to carry out three things:
1) Chronic disease programs
2) Health promotion
3) Genomics programs
I don’t have a problem with the second point. “Health promotion” sounds good (unless it’s nothing more than mammograms and mental health screening programs designed to sell more chemotherapy and psych drugs). But what, exactly, is meant by the phrase “…to carry out chronic disease”? And what is meant by “genomics programs”? Are we talking about government-funded genetic experimentation on human babies, perhaps? It wouldn’t be the first time. See: http://www.naturalnews.com/019189.html
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Big Brother Health Care Provisions Slipped Into Economic Stimulus Bill
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
by: Mike Adams Natural News
The new $800 billion economic stimulus bill contains some striking new "Big Brother" health care language that should give pause to all freedom-loving Americans. For starters, the bill requires the electronic tracking of the medical records of all Americans. All your private medical data will be stored in a government database, including your history of disease, pharmaceutical treatments, surgeries and even emergency room visits.
How would you like the government knowing all the details about your drug rehab? Or alcoholism treatments? Abortion? Sexually-transmitted disease diagnosis? Pregnancy status? Blood test results?
But it gets even more interesting than that: Under the new provisions found in the bill, all U.S. doctors will now be stripped of autonomy and forced to follow the medical treatment guidelines dictated by the government.
This news should rock the medical world (once they truly understand it). It means doctors can no longer make their own decisions about patients' needs or treatment protocols. From now on, all health care decisions will be centrally planned by a dictatorial, Big Brother health care authority in the federal government.
How to turn doctors into sheeple
As Bloomberg.com reports (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?...), Tom Daschle was one of the architects of this plan, and he says that doctors "have to learn to operate less like solo practitioners."
Any doctor that deviates from that plan would be penalized by the government. That means, for example, that a local doctor who knows the patient and his family, and who is aware of specific local circumstances affecting that patient will no longer be able to apply any of that knowledge in treating the patient. All treatments will be dictated from the government, obliterating the whole point of allowing doctors to operate with some degree of autonomy in the first place.
Effectively, this bill transforms the entire U.S. medical profession into nothing more than pill-pushing puppets. It wipes out the intelligence of a local doctor and replaces it with the stupidity of Big Government.
If the government says all expectant mothers must be screened for depression and put on antidepressant drugs, then all the doctors have to play along and do that if they don't want to be fined or have their medical licenses taken away. If the government says nutritional supplements are dangerous and cannot be recommended to patients, then all doctors must remain silent and avoid telling patients the truth about helpful nutritional supplements. Whatever the government dictates must now be mirrored by all practicing doctors.
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
by: Mike Adams Natural News
The new $800 billion economic stimulus bill contains some striking new "Big Brother" health care language that should give pause to all freedom-loving Americans. For starters, the bill requires the electronic tracking of the medical records of all Americans. All your private medical data will be stored in a government database, including your history of disease, pharmaceutical treatments, surgeries and even emergency room visits.
How would you like the government knowing all the details about your drug rehab? Or alcoholism treatments? Abortion? Sexually-transmitted disease diagnosis? Pregnancy status? Blood test results?
But it gets even more interesting than that: Under the new provisions found in the bill, all U.S. doctors will now be stripped of autonomy and forced to follow the medical treatment guidelines dictated by the government.
This news should rock the medical world (once they truly understand it). It means doctors can no longer make their own decisions about patients' needs or treatment protocols. From now on, all health care decisions will be centrally planned by a dictatorial, Big Brother health care authority in the federal government.
How to turn doctors into sheeple
As Bloomberg.com reports (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?...), Tom Daschle was one of the architects of this plan, and he says that doctors "have to learn to operate less like solo practitioners."
Any doctor that deviates from that plan would be penalized by the government. That means, for example, that a local doctor who knows the patient and his family, and who is aware of specific local circumstances affecting that patient will no longer be able to apply any of that knowledge in treating the patient. All treatments will be dictated from the government, obliterating the whole point of allowing doctors to operate with some degree of autonomy in the first place.
Effectively, this bill transforms the entire U.S. medical profession into nothing more than pill-pushing puppets. It wipes out the intelligence of a local doctor and replaces it with the stupidity of Big Government.
If the government says all expectant mothers must be screened for depression and put on antidepressant drugs, then all the doctors have to play along and do that if they don't want to be fined or have their medical licenses taken away. If the government says nutritional supplements are dangerous and cannot be recommended to patients, then all doctors must remain silent and avoid telling patients the truth about helpful nutritional supplements. Whatever the government dictates must now be mirrored by all practicing doctors.
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Economic Fallacies 101: Government Does Not Create More Jobs Through "Stimulus" Debt Spending
by Mike Adams
Saturday, February 07, 2009 by: Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
While Congress has passed an $800+ billion economic stimulus plan, almost everybody in America seems caught up in a common economic fallacy: The idea that Government can "create" jobs through debt spending.
Government spending of debt money does not result in any net creation of jobs at all. It only confiscates wealth from private citizens and forces them to pay for centrally-planned jobs that the real economy usually neither needs nor benefits from.
Consider three people living in an island, running their own tiny economy. Bob, Sarah and Charlie are all farmers who grow their own food, making an honest living by working 8 hours a day to create the food, clothing and shelter they need to survive.
One day, Charlie decides he wants to be the Governor of the island. He tells Bob and Sarah that as Governor, he'll bring wealth and prosperity to them both. Initially, that sounds good, so Bob and Sarah agree to elect him Governor.
Then it turns out that the Governor is busy governing things on the island (i.e. deciding what everybody else should do), so he has no time to grow his own food. So he initiates a 50% tax on the productivity of Bob and Sarah, confiscating their food, clothing and resources in order to provide those items to himself without actually having to work for them. (This is a key function of government: To confiscate wealth from those who really work and redistribute it to those who pretend to work.)
Now, Bob and Sarah each have a choice: They can either work twice as much in order to pay their tax and still have enough to survive, or they can quit working altogether and hope to get aid from the government.
Sarah decides to work twice as much, so she starts working 16 hours a day, earning enough to pay the taxes to the Governor while still having some remaining food to feed herself and her family. Bob, on the other hand, decides he doesn't want to work 16 hours a day and would rather do nothing and apply to the Governor for "public assistance."
So now on this island of three people, where each of the three people used to work to feed themselves, only one person is working (Sarah), and the other two are living off the wealth that's being confiscated from her efforts.
One day Charlie, the Governor, says he has a solution! He says he will write a series of IOUs to Sarah in exchange for an extra portion of her food and other belongings. Using that currency borrowed from Sarah, he says he will "create a new job" for Bob and "end unemployment on the island."
Sarah reluctantly agrees and turns over the fruits of her labor to the Governor, who injvents a job for Bob. "Bob," he says, "We need to build a bridge across this island!" And with the wave of his hand, he puts Bob to work creating a bridge (that nobody needs) while getting paid by wealth that has been confiscated from the only person on the island still working (Sarah).
by Mike Adams
Saturday, February 07, 2009 by: Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
While Congress has passed an $800+ billion economic stimulus plan, almost everybody in America seems caught up in a common economic fallacy: The idea that Government can "create" jobs through debt spending.
Government spending of debt money does not result in any net creation of jobs at all. It only confiscates wealth from private citizens and forces them to pay for centrally-planned jobs that the real economy usually neither needs nor benefits from.
Consider three people living in an island, running their own tiny economy. Bob, Sarah and Charlie are all farmers who grow their own food, making an honest living by working 8 hours a day to create the food, clothing and shelter they need to survive.
One day, Charlie decides he wants to be the Governor of the island. He tells Bob and Sarah that as Governor, he'll bring wealth and prosperity to them both. Initially, that sounds good, so Bob and Sarah agree to elect him Governor.
Then it turns out that the Governor is busy governing things on the island (i.e. deciding what everybody else should do), so he has no time to grow his own food. So he initiates a 50% tax on the productivity of Bob and Sarah, confiscating their food, clothing and resources in order to provide those items to himself without actually having to work for them. (This is a key function of government: To confiscate wealth from those who really work and redistribute it to those who pretend to work.)
Now, Bob and Sarah each have a choice: They can either work twice as much in order to pay their tax and still have enough to survive, or they can quit working altogether and hope to get aid from the government.
Sarah decides to work twice as much, so she starts working 16 hours a day, earning enough to pay the taxes to the Governor while still having some remaining food to feed herself and her family. Bob, on the other hand, decides he doesn't want to work 16 hours a day and would rather do nothing and apply to the Governor for "public assistance."
So now on this island of three people, where each of the three people used to work to feed themselves, only one person is working (Sarah), and the other two are living off the wealth that's being confiscated from her efforts.
One day Charlie, the Governor, says he has a solution! He says he will write a series of IOUs to Sarah in exchange for an extra portion of her food and other belongings. Using that currency borrowed from Sarah, he says he will "create a new job" for Bob and "end unemployment on the island."
Sarah reluctantly agrees and turns over the fruits of her labor to the Governor, who injvents a job for Bob. "Bob," he says, "We need to build a bridge across this island!" And with the wave of his hand, he puts Bob to work creating a bridge (that nobody needs) while getting paid by wealth that has been confiscated from the only person on the island still working (Sarah).
Saturday, February 07, 2009
Hip Hop Community Coming Out Against Barack Obama
Two very popular people from the Hip Hop community have gotten a hold of Alex Jones lately and are wanting to talk about our new President. Professor Griff of Public Enemy was sopose to be on his show this last week but got caught up in touring and haven't made it on yet. After watching this interview i can't wait till he goes on the show it should make for good talk radio.
Here's an interview i was really surprised by with Professor Griff of Public Enemy openly talking about Barack Obama during the summer last year. Pretty powerful.
KRS-One Interview with Alex Jones
I never heard of this guy till last week, but i love this interview. At some parts i wanted to stand up and clap, it was so moving! You could hear women in the back of the room clapping when he spoke about how women are degraded in society today.
KRS-One spoke about a lot of shit that speaks truth to power. I love it when he compairs the presidency to the manager of Burger King. HA! And when he spoke of women needing to be put in their rightful place in society, and also when he spoke of americans "having what ever you like" that was awesome. Great interview!
Two very popular people from the Hip Hop community have gotten a hold of Alex Jones lately and are wanting to talk about our new President. Professor Griff of Public Enemy was sopose to be on his show this last week but got caught up in touring and haven't made it on yet. After watching this interview i can't wait till he goes on the show it should make for good talk radio.
Here's an interview i was really surprised by with Professor Griff of Public Enemy openly talking about Barack Obama during the summer last year. Pretty powerful.
KRS-One Interview with Alex Jones
I never heard of this guy till last week, but i love this interview. At some parts i wanted to stand up and clap, it was so moving! You could hear women in the back of the room clapping when he spoke about how women are degraded in society today.
KRS-One spoke about a lot of shit that speaks truth to power. I love it when he compairs the presidency to the manager of Burger King. HA! And when he spoke of women needing to be put in their rightful place in society, and also when he spoke of americans "having what ever you like" that was awesome. Great interview!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)